By
Kathleen Stephenson
and Lisa Petkun
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter
LinkedIn
LinkedIn
Email
Email
0 Comments
Comments
The language of the prior forms required the charitable reminder beneficiary to be an organization described in Section 170(c). Using this language could be a problem for an inter vivos CRUT, because such an organization could be a private foundation, which would then cause the donor to be subject to a lower income tax charitable deduction percentage limitation. The explanatory annotations include language in the event that the donor desires that a public charity be the charitable beneficiary.
Kathleen A. Stephenson is of counsel with the Philadelphia office of Pepper Hamilton LLP. Lisa B. Petkun is a partner in Pepper Hamilton’s tax department. They can be reached via www.pepperlaw.com.
« Previous 1 2 3 4 All
0 Comments
View Comments
Related Content
Comments