(Editor's note: Veritus Group co-owner Jeff Schreifels started the Passionate Giving blog last month, and he's already posted some pretty interesting stuff — like his "10 Reasons Why Most Major Gift Programs Suck!" He's only up to No. 5, so we're going to try to play catch-up. Here's No. 1. Check out the blog for the next four. Then we'll share the next five as he does.)
Over the years, we here at Veritus Group have audited more than a hundred different major-gift programs. Almost all of them suck. "Do you really have to use that language, Jeff?" Yes, yes I do. It’s not that these programs are bad or they need a little tweak here and there; it’s that they are just plain awful. So, the word, “sucks” really fits.
I’ve come up with 10 reasons why this is the case. Now, there are more than 10, and over the course of time I’m sure we’ll get into them all. But, to be pithy and to get people to read my blog, I’m coming up with 10.
OK, I’m going to start with No. 1. Yeah, I know everyone does this countdown thing, but I’m not David Letterman and all of these “reasons” carry the same weight so just hang in there with me.
1. Development directors review the WRONG criteria for success
When we ask a development director how he thinks his program is performing, we usually get an answer like this: “Well, four out of our six major-gift officers made their goals this year. It’s not perfect, but I think we’re doing pretty well.”
Then we ask this: “What is your caseload attrition rate, and what is the value attrition year to year?”
Blank stares, sweat starting to bead up on brow, face turning red …

Jeff Schreifels is the principal owner of Veritus Group — an agency that partners with nonprofits to create, build and manage mid-level fundraising, major gifts and planned giving programs. In his 32-plus year career, Jeff has worked with hundreds of nonprofits, helping to raise more than $400 million in revenue.





